Getting paid a fair whack

Posted: Wednesday, 15 August 2012 @ 10:27

There are many times that work is carried out where no price has been fixed. Does this leave the workman without a claim? Not a bit of it. It has long been a principle of English law that someone should not have the benefit of unjust enrichment.

There are 3 possible scenarios:

1. Work has been done under a contract that has subsequently been found to be invalid
2. Work has been done for someone who expressly or impliedly requested it but no price was agreed
3. A price was agreed but only part of the work was carried out

The principle is known as quantum meruit. No, it is not a Bond movie, but Latin which translates as “as much as he has earned”. But the biggest question is just how much has he earned?

The courts award a fair and reasonable sum based on the market value at the date the work or services were undertaken. That does not mean just the cost to the workman. A recent Court of Appeal case Beneditti v Sawiris in 2009 made it clear that there were a number of factors which may be relevant depending on the circumstances of the claim.

The value of the benefit received by the paying party is one possible factor. Another is any unsuccessful negotiations which may suggest the market value in terms of the parties’ offers. But it is certainly not a valid argument to say that little work was carried out. Market value may suggest that the value has no relationship to the base value of the actual work carried out. This may be relevant with artistic works. Also work which by custom is priced by a commission percentage. Examples are introduction services, such as recruitment agencies. In Mr Beneditti’s case he was a financial deal broker, where work was normally valued on a commission basis. He was entitled to a very large commission even where the actual amount of work carried out was very small in comparison.

So, if there is no signed contract and no agreed price, that is not the end of the road. Market value should be able to show the bottom and top end of the fee range for that type of work, and the worker should not receive less than the bottom end of the scale.

So if you have a contract dispute concerning the price it may well pay you to obtain early legal advice.

Nigel Musgrove
Business and Litigation Solicitor
Tel: 0845 003 5639

Blog by Nigel Musgrove
Nigel has been providing dispute resolution advice as a solicitor for over 35 years. As well as advising SMEs and business owners on disputes he also offers a specialist licensing law service. View profile
Call Nigel on +44 (0)1285 847 001 or by email
This blog is not intended to constitute legal advice, nor is it intended to be a complete and authoritative statement of the law, and what we say might be out of date by the time you read it. You should always seek legal advice to confirm whether or how any information in this article applies to your particular situation. We offer a free telephone consultation to discuss your particular circumstances.


  • There are no comments for this page - click here to be the first

Need legal advice for your business? We can help


Practical advice and legal support for company owners and directors.


In dispute with a customer or supplier? Get practical advice and support.

Your legal advisor

Your legal advisor
Board level legal advice without the costs of an in-house lawyer.

Speak to a lawyer

Speak to a lawyer
Thank you. Your response is great, very straight to the point! Hopefully this will bring an end to the matter. I will certainly be recommending your services as I am very impressed with the prompt dealing of this matter.
Janet Burbidge

Get legal updates

Enter your email address to receive our monthly Blog Newsletter

We will keep your email safe in accordance with our privacy policy.

Get the FREE definitive guide to solving business disputes

Speak to a lawyer

Get legal updates

Enter your email address to receive our monthly Blog Newsletter
The Law Society